Let's look at the issue of outsourcing. According to a Harris poll of 4000 Americans only 16% support the outsourcing of jobs to other countries. On the surface, it looks as though outsourcing is a terrible idea. How could Americans losing jobs be a good thing? We are supposedly getting weaker while other countries gets stronger. This is a perfect example of "feel good economics".
In 1930, Senator Willis C Hawley and Representative Reed Smoot felt as 84% of Americans feel today. At that time many agricultural jobs were being sent over seas as globalization was beginning to take hold. Farmers were complaining and politicians were trying to get elected. Disregarding a petition signed by 1,028 economists, The Smoot-Hawley act was passed on June 17, 1930. This act raised tariffs on nearly 20,000 imported goods to unprecedented levels. It turned out to be a disaster of epic proportions. Countries around the world retaliated out of fear for their own well being, the miracle of competitive advantage disappeared, and not so coincidentally the world fell into The Great Depression.
Here is what Congress and President Hoover failed to understand. You do not need to protect jobs, you need to make sure that your economy is so fluid that it can quickly adapt to any changes it faces. In simple terms, if Americans can get ears of corn from Mexico fo
r $1 instead of $1.25, every corn buying American has essentially received a raise of .25. If you multiply this over 20,000 products then every American has received a substantial raise. With this new found income Americans now have the means to create new markets that would not have been able to flourish at the prior income levels. In this case, the corn shucker loses his job only to find new work at a radio making factory (an example). Everyone is better off in this fluid system, including the foreign countries who now have more money with which to buy our goods. This is a healthy economy.This issue relates today with the Obama administration trying to please the uninformed voters by adding a clause to the new stimulation packages that ensures all public projects must use domestic raw materials (at a substantially higher cost). As we can learn from Smoot-Hawley, this is actually anti-stimulus.
With the issues of the world being so complex and contradictory, coming to the correct answer to a problem almost always requires more analysis than what the average voter is capable of. The majority of voters make decisions based on whether an issue is self serving, smart, and just.
They just want to "feel good".



